Find link

language:

Find link is a tool written by Edward Betts.

Longer titles found: Economic torts in English law (view)

searching for Economic torts 8 found (130 total)

Rookes v Barnard (1,591 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

immediately reversed by the Trade Disputes Act 1965 insofar as it decided on economic torts, although the law on punitive damages remains authoritative. Douglas

Keeble v Hickeringill (474 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

held that Keeble v Hickeringill was just a nuisance case, and not an economic torts case. Pierson v. Post Ghen v. Rich Ratione soli "Keeble v. Hickeringill

Damage (1,379 words) [view diff] case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article

and Unfair Trading (1914), p. 268. Hazel Carty, An Analysis of the Economic Torts (2010), p. 257. Francis Ghesquiere, Sovereign Natural Disaster Insurance

Jason W. Neyers (350 words) [view diff] case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article

2012) “What (is) a Nuisance?” (2011) 90 Canadian Bar Review 215. “The Economic Torts as Corrective Justice” (2009) 17 Torts Law Journal 162. “Rights-Based

Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (1,769 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

beginning with the Trade Union Act 1871. After a number of cases imposing economic torts for unions taking action, the Trade Disputes Act 1906 confirmed that

RMT v Serco Ltd (1,235 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

typically be liable for inducing a breach of contract, and sometimes other economic torts are committed during the course of a strike. Without some protection

Law (17,399 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

allegations that damage a politician's reputation. More infamous are economic torts, which form the basis of labour law in some countries by making trade

English land law (25,697 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

this orthodox distinction is no longer strictly valid because of the economic torts, such as interference with a contract, e.g. Lumley v Gye [1853] EWHC