Find link

language:

Find link is a tool written by Edward Betts.

searching for Clark Glymour 8 found (28 total)

Frederick Eberhardt (philosopher) (194 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

special issue "Causation, probability, and truth—the philosophy of Clark Glymour"". Synthese. 193 (4): 1007–1010. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-1007-7. ISSN 1573-0964

O. Carl Simonton (588 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Edward R. Dream Your Cancer Away: The Simontons. In Douglas Stalker, Clark Glymour. (1985). Examining Holistic Medicine. Prometheus Books. pp. 273-285

Wilhelm Fliess (1,453 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

rhythmic cycles overlooked by scientists who study biological rhythms." Clark Glymour and Douglas Stalker, "Winning through Pseudoscience," in Grim, Patrick

Biorhythm (pseudoscience) (2,322 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

rhythm Chronotherapy (treatment scheduling) Circadian rhythm Mood ring Clark Glymour, Douglas Stalker (1990). "Winning through pseudoscience". In Patrick

Nikolay Milkov (professor) (1,240 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article

471–3. Massimo Ferrari, Rivista di Filosofia 104:2 (2013), pp. 339–341. Clark Glymour, Balkan Journal of Philosophy 6:1 (2014), pp. 72–5. Thomas Uebel, Metascience

Causality (11,911 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Spirtes, Peter, Clark Glymour and Richard Scheines Causation, Prediction, and Search, MIT Press, ISBN 0-262-19440-6

List of topics characterized as pseudoscience (38,829 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

Archived from the original on 15 October 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2019. Clark Glymour & Douglas Stalker (1990). "Winning through pseudoscience". In Patrick

General relativity priority dispute (5,427 words) [view diff] exact match in snippet view article find links to article

mentioned by Corry et al. As noted by the historians John Earman and Clark Glymour, "questions about the priority of discoveries are often among the least